The University Grants Commission (UGC) has implemented regulations that have stirred debate among academics regarding faculty retirement and its impact on PhD supervision. Under the UGC’s 2022 guidelines, faculty members with less than three years before retirement are prohibited from supervising new research scholars, raising concerns about the contributions of retiring faculty. M Jagadesh Kumar, UGC Chairman, addresses these issues in a recent interview.
Justification of UGC Regulations
Kumar argues that the UGC regulations are designed to ensure that PhD students have uninterrupted access to their primary supervisors throughout the typical 4 to 5-year research journey. Allowing retiring faculty to take on new scholars could lead to disruptions in guidance, compromising the student’s academic success. The regulations permit retiring faculty to serve as co-supervisors up to the age of 70, allowing them to remain involved without hindering the student’s access to ongoing mentorship.
Recognition of Retiring Supervisors
Concerns have been raised that retiring supervisors may not receive full credit for their contributions if a new supervisor is appointed. Kumar asserts that retiring faculty members can still be credited as co-supervisors in research publications and thesis acknowledgments. He emphasizes that the co-supervisory role does not diminish their involvement but rather ensures students receive essential support from full-time faculty who can handle administrative responsibilities effectively.
Applicability of Different Regulations
Kumar acknowledges that while IITs have different supervisory rules, implementing similar changes in central universities requires careful consideration. Universities face diverse challenges, and ensuring that full-time faculty can meet students’ needs is crucial for academic success. Allowing retired faculty to serve as sole supervisors may create gaps in institutional support and expose students to potential delays in their research progress.
Longevity of Academic Careers
While academics often enjoy longer careers, Kumar emphasizes that the regulations are not meant to stifle the contributions of retired faculty. The transition from primary supervisor to co-supervisor is designed to maintain continuity in supervision while ensuring students receive the full-time support they need.
Co-Supervisory Role
Kumar clarifies that the co-supervisory position is not a demotion but a complementary role, allowing retiring faculty to contribute their expertise while meeting the practical needs of PhD students. The UGC regulation aims to balance institutional accountability with the valuable insights of retired faculty, ensuring that students have the necessary guidance to successfully complete their research.
In conclusion, the UGC regulations reflect a commitment to maintaining academic standards while recognizing the contributions of retiring faculty members. By fostering a collaborative environment, the UGC seeks to support both students and faculty in navigating the complexities of academic research.
