Kerala has opposed the implementation of the PM SHRI (PM Schools for Rising India) scheme, citing conflicts with its existing school education framework. PM SHRI, a Centrally-sponsored scheme, aims to develop over 14,500 schools managed by the Central government, states, Union Territories, and local bodies, including Kendriya Vidyalayas and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas.
Why Kerala Opposes PM SHRI
Kerala’s state government argues that PM SHRI undermines its decentralised and inclusive education model. According to John Brittas, a CPI(M) MP, Kerala’s education system is already advanced in terms of quality, infrastructure, and pedagogy. He noted that the state’s public education mission has set a national benchmark, which a centrally designed scheme like PM SHRI would disrupt.
Education Minister V Sivankutty pointed out that the state contributes 40% of the funds under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. Despite this, the Union government is withholding funds due to Kerala’s refusal to sign the PM SHRI MoU. Kerala officials argue that this violates the Right to Education Act and contradicts earlier guidelines on central assistance.
Impact on Kerala’s Curriculum
Under PM SHRI, the school curriculum would be determined by the Union government, forcing state-run schools to abandon the Kerala syllabus. Kerala officials have raised concerns over the Hindutva agenda in the Centre’s textbooks, which they claim dilute constitutional values.
The state has also resisted the 5+3+3+4 education structure outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, preferring its own 3+7+5 structure. Kerala’s curriculum includes subjects such as cyber law, disaster management, mental health, and road safety, reflecting its commitment to real-world preparedness and comprehensive education.
Federal Influence and Political Concerns
Critics argue that PM SHRI allows the Centre to influence state-run schools under the guise of development. Schools selected for PM SHRI will have to display PM SHRI boards, potentially giving the Centre credit for state-driven initiatives. This mirrors the pressure faced by Kerala’s health sector to rebrand its Primary Health Centres as Ayushman Ayur Mandirs.
Moreover, PM SHRI schools will have the authority to mentor nearby schools, extending the Centre’s influence over regional education policies. Critics see this as an attempt to impose a uniform, centralised education system, undermining the federal structure.
Kerala’s Independent Approach to Education
Kerala has maintained a distinct approach to education, focusing on secularism, scientific temper, and social justice. The state has introduced supplementary textbooks covering omitted NCERT portions on sociology, history, and political science to ensure a balanced curriculum.
In higher education, Kerala follows a dual approach of knowledge acquisition and practical skill development. The state’s four-year undergraduate programme offers students industry-relevant skills while promoting innovation and entrepreneurship.
Conclusion
Kerala’s opposition to PM SHRI reflects its commitment to preserving the integrity of its education model. The state aims to protect its decentralised and inclusive system, ensuring that students benefit from a balanced education aligned with constitutional values and regional needs.
